Friday, 13 April 2012

On Mark Waid's Daredevil & Preaching To The Converted (Part 3 of 3, or rather, 4)

Continued from here and here; "The superhero comic is an impossibly tough sell, so how to convert the blissfully unconcerned heathen who isn't already predisposed towards the adventures of the cape'n'chest-insignia brigade? ... Which books might just convince a broad audience of folks who aren't adolescently-minded shlock-shock addicts to buy into the super-hero habit"

       
7. Daredevil by Mark Waid, Paolo Rivera, Marcos Martin, Kano et al


Give the public what the public thinks it wants, and then give it far, far more than it ever asked for. The fans who first found themselves beguiled by the sparsely populated Silver Age superhero universes soon found the comics which they followed inundated by hundreds and then thousands of outlandish inhabitants. The same process saw readers who were at first thrilled by threats to neighbourhood banks and city museums quickly faced by the prospect of the end of the world, and then the end of the universe, and then the end of a whole mutiverse of universes. In creating these armies of costumed characters faced perpetually by the most hysterical of dooms, the comics industry has managed to make its product  almost entirely impenetrable while also diluting the appeal of the individual superhero facing anything less than cosmos-threatening levels of danger. When everybody's super-powered, super-powers count for little at all except to fascinate the costume-spotting reader at the cost of the alienation of everyone else. When reality is always at risk of being destroyed, the threat of the same is no more tremblesome than the forecast of a little rain, while the risk of a touch of disorder in a local neighbourhood becomes an uninteresting, uninspiring business. It's a quandary which seems to have left an entire generation of Big Two creators reduced to presenting scenes of indiscriminate body horror in order to attract their reader's jaded attention. Swords through the stomach, rats gnawing through the chest, war gods torn apart, daughters eaten by wolves; when the mass of super-heroes bear little sign of the noteworthy and distinct, then all that's left is to shock through the breaking of taboos, until, in the end, even the taboos themselves are worn away through the banality of unimaginative repetition.

        
We're surely not supposed to take the sight of a man leaping from the top of one skyscraper to another for granted, but where the super-book's concerned, we mostly do. What's so special about that when only the least powerful superheroes are reduced to such proletarian methods of transport? By contrast, Mark Waid's work on Daredevil has been characterised by a deliberate and entirely successful attempt to reclaim the sense of wonder from the hyperbole of the fan-pandering superhero tale. Instead of pumping up Daredevil's abilities and/or creating overwhelmingly fearsome menaces which only he can heroically and desperately defeat, Waid has focused on representing how reality is understood through the intriguingly-enhanced senses of the blind Man Without Fear. By switching our attention away from the superhero's punch-ups towards the superhero's experience of their own impossible abilities, Waid has turned his readers from voyeurs of genre excess to empathetic companions of a remarkable, and all-too-fallible, point-of-view character. Waid's stories are marked by smartly thought-through sequences in which, for example, we're shown how Matt Murdock's radar sense guides him across a crowded Manhattan street while emphasising the practical limitations of the same miraculous process. Combined with the imaginative work of the cadre of skilled artists he's been paired with on the book, Waid's scripts describe Daredevil's world to us through his senses rather than expecting the reader to struggle to come to terms with the predominantly obtuse, excluding charms of the Marvel Universe as it's usually presented.


       
Perhaps the most technically impressive aspect of Waid's Daredevil is the way in which he fully embraces Marvel's long fictional history without ever descending into cliche, repetition or fanboy obscurity. In that, Daredevil's not a comic which excludes the hardcore fan or the newcomer so much as one which incorporates them both into a wider community of consumers. For example, Waid grounds Daredevil's conflict with a subterranean race in the context of a quest for the lost body of Murdock's dead father, charging what might otherwise be nothing more than yet another fantastical confrontation with a genuinely moving degree of emotion. Similarly, where a master of comics continuity might be absolutely fascinated by the alliance of five secret criminal organisations which emerges as the main antagonist of Waid's stories, the less superhero-centric of readers is far more likely to become snared by the plight of the young blind Austin Chao who inadvertently falls foul of their hooded selves.


         
Waid doesn't just work to make the figure of Daredevil a more compelling and distinct superhero. He also anchors the character's alter ego in a recognisably real-world routine. Matt Murdock is constantly shown attending, after his own wilful fashion, to his professional responsibilities as a lawyer. From training fearful citizens in how to represent themselves before a judge and jury, to investigating whether super-villains are being held in cruel and unusual circumstances, Murdock's enmeshed in recognisably conventional if high-powered affairs. In that, Waid presents us with the sight of an admittedly flawed but recognisably adult character interacting with clients, colleagues and friends, creating the impression that Murdock is a far more substantial character than just another trademarked costumed product filling up shelf-space in the hope of inspiring another movie. Waid's Daredevil describes a corner of a world in which, for all it's obvious and fantastical differences, a great many of our own experiences and concerns are reflected and discussed, albeit in a way that's consistently entertaining and never worthy or pretentious. In that, it very much isn't a comic designed solely for the costumed-crimefighter zealot who wants nothing to do with anything of real life and its pains and pleasures, unless it's the sight of it being left far behind by a phalanx of flying Over-people disappearing off into the heavens.

     

To be concluded;
.

10 comments:

  1. Waid et all's "Daredevil" has to be the most pleasant surprise to come out of Marvel in the last year. It's fun without being twee, clever without being pretentious, and manages to contain a wide range of emotional experience. It would be easy to write it off as just being "light-hearted" (and compared to the vast majority of super-hero comics, it certainly is), but that obscures the fact that it's also quite intense and dark at times, and has a very menacing air hanging around the edges.

    I tend to think of "Daredevil" as belonging in darker, noirish stories. I always had a hard time imagining him fitting into the lighter super-hero world the rest of the Marvel heroes inhabited... until this book came along.

    I think people underestimate Waid at their own peril. He tends to be written off sometimes. He's not a flashy or known for constantly writing "EVERYTHING CHANGES!!!!!!!!!" story lines or for big-concept mind-benders like Morrison or Hickman, and at the same time he doesn't try to cover up for it with Geoff John's-like pandering to the core fanboy audience. But at heart he's something that is sometimes even better than any of those things, and surely what super-hero books need now more than ever: an incredibly competent story-teller. Thank goodness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Adam:- I really do agree with you about the virtues of Daredevil. It's every bit as well-written as you say, and it's hard - up until recently - the advantage of some absolutely top-notch artists too. Some very well-written Marvel titles have had less than outstanding - if often quite competent - art in the recent past, meaning that they've not shone as well as they might.

      I also agree wholeheartedly with your assessment of Waid's virtues. I'm consistently impressed by how he manages to reinvent himself. It's hard to think of any other writer who was working at the turn of the 90s who is still producing work as fine as his Daredevil. Like anyone who's been done so much over such a long period, he's produced work which hasn't so caught my eye. That's of course the "fault" of my taste rather than of his work, just in case I'm sounding if the dreaded entitlement has infected me. That my favourite work of his ever just happens to the work he's producing today shows what an admirable creator he is. And of course he's organising his own digital on-line projects too, showing that he remains determined to stay ahead of the curve. An inspiration, I believe. Yes, thank goodness :)

      Delete
  2. Hi Colin

    Another interesting post. I've only read one issue of Waid's Daredevil so far, and it was a self-contained story (remember those!) with no super-powered villains; just Daredevil battling the elements to get a group of blind kids to safety after a coach crash. Wonderful stuff.

    Mark Waid seems the perfect choice to take over this title. As acclaimed as Bendis' run was, it was little more than an extension of the same old stuff that Frank Miller pioneered on the title way back in the early eighties. A lift out of the grim and gritty, almost nihilistic atmosphere of the last thirty years is most welcome. I mean, how much more can you degrade the character before it descends into self-parody?

    Cheers

    Marcus

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Marcus:- I too really enjoyed the story you described. I had the strongest sense through-out its pages that it was very much a fond tip of the hat to Will Eisner's Spirit X-Ma stories. Whether it was or not, it was indeed a splendid read.

      I think I'm with you on the BMB Daredevil. On the one hand, I admire the book, but I certainly couldn't warm to it, and for the reasons you allude to. I can't argue with the quality of BMB and AM's work on the title, but all that bleakness just isn't to my taste when it appears month-in, month-out for year upon year. I thought the way in which Waid took all of that darkness and raised DD out of it without magiking the past away was masterful. Now, THAT'S the way to pull such a trick off ...

      Delete
    2. I don't think BMB's run on Daredevil was the problem; it was Brubaker's run (once Matt got out of prison) and then Diggle's that took the book too far into the dark. BMB's Daredevil was certainly indebted to the Miller era but felt like its own thing to me.

      Delete
    3. Hello Rob:- BMB's DD is a good example of a book which I enjoyed and yet couldn't quite feel enthused about. Actually, that's wrong; I did feel enthusiastic about finding about what happened, and I never felt that the work was being phoned in on any level whatsoever. It's great work, but I guess I wasn't ultimately convinced by Matt's deterioration. I'd certainly agree that BMB's DD was his own thing. Absolutely. I'm always surprised to find folks referring to it as a Miller knock-off.

      Strangely enough, I thought the first Brubaker four-parter was a real winner. But after that, I fear I'm with you ...

      Delete
    4. Oh, I agree that "Devil in Cell Block D" is an awesome tale; Brubaker just went afterwards and trashed everything else BMB had established in his run (like Milla, poor Milla).

      Delete
    5. Hello Rob;- It's actually astonishingly how wrong the Brubaker run went, isn't it? From the second arc onwards, things started to go very wrong indeed. I doubt I'll ever want to read the run again, despite enjoying a great deal of the work of the folks involved.

      Poor Milla indeed.

      Delete
  3. I've been having interesting thoughts recently (based on the David Brothers piece about Marvel's double-shipping policy) about the return of the Cult of the Writer, and I find it fascinating that you don't mention any artist in this post whatsoever. I'm waiting for the trade on Daredevil, but how much, do you think, does its success at what you say it does - offer a good place to introduce neophytes to superheroes - depend on Martin and Rivera and anyone else who happens to draw it? I know you don't ignore artists, so I just found it interesting that you didn't mention them here. Cheers!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Greg:- I think the art is absolutely essential, although I think that the key is great art at the service of a great story.In trying here to keep the summary down to a few paragraphs, and in having discussed Daredevil here and elsewhere, I tried to focus, for whatever it's worth, upon the essential qualities which I think make the book a great entrance point for the unconvinced, and those qualities are, I believe, primarily located in Waid's script. By which I mean, the book could have the finest artists in the world on it, but if the story wasn't grounded in a take on everyday reality and organised around representations of Matt's powers at work, it'd be no good for anyone but the fans.

      It's a process which I think can be seen at work in the recent .5 issue of the book. The art there is adequate, but hardly outstanding. The artist - the book's not in front of me at the moment - works hard, but they've not yet developed their own chops. Yet I think that an "outsider" who's gained the taste for Daredevil, when particularly Rivera and Martin were drawing it, would most likely persevere because of the quality of Waid's script. They most likely wouldn't get hooked by a comic with adequate art in it in the first place, but they may well persevere with it once the taste has been gained.

      But the broader public doesn't give three flying ducks for all the fancy rendering and full page money shots in the world.

      So, yes, I guess I am saying that the key quality for a book which is going to reach out beyond the hardcore to a broad adult audience is the writing. That doesn't mean that the art isn't vitally important, but it does mean that the writing comes first. With Rivera and Martin, Waid's DD is a classic. Without them, it's still a good book.

      Interestingly, I'd suggest that many of those comic book writers who have a fanboy following actually produce work in the super-book which would be incredibly unlikely to appeal to anyone else. BMB's Avengers issues, for example, may well go down with the fans, as does Johns's work on the JLA. But that, I think, just shows how isolated the fan market has become from any broader audience.

      Delete